Configure Splunk Agent Observability for Out-of-the-Box and LLM-as-a-judge evaluators
Most Out-of-the-Box evaluators and all LLM-as-a-judge evaluators are LLM-based evaluators. LLM-based evaluators use an LLM to evaluate inputs and outputs. To use these evaluators from Agent Streams or Experiments, you first need to configure an integration with an LLM platform.2
Add an integration
Locate the LLM provider you are using (or specify a custom integration), then select the +Add Integration button.

3
Add settings
Specify settings for your integration (such as an API key), then select Save changes.
Using evaluators effectively
To get the most value from Splunk Agent Observability’s evaluators:- Start with key evaluators - Focus on evaluators most relevant to your use case
- Establish baselines - Understand your current performance before making changes
- Track trends over time - Monitor how evaluators change as you iterate on your system
- Combine multiple evaluators - Look at related evaluators together for a more complete picture
- Set thresholds - Define acceptable ranges for critical evaluators
- Improve the evaluators - Use CLHF to continuously improve the evaluators
Out-of-the-Box evaluator categories
Our evaluators can be broken down into seven key categories, each addressing a specific aspect of AI system performance. You may benefit from using evaluators from more than one category. Splunk Agent Observability also supports custom evaluators that are able to be implemented alongside the Out-of-the-Box evaluator options. The Evaluators Comparison provides a full list of the Out-of-the-Box evaluators for each category.1. Agentic performance evaluators
Agentic Performance Evaluators evaluate how effectively AI agents perform tasks, use tools, and progress toward goals.2. Expression and readability evaluators
Expression And Readability Evaluators assess the style, tone, clarity, and overall presentation of AI-generated content.3. Multimodal quality evaluators
Multimodal Quality Evaluators evaluate whether multimodal inputs and outputs (such as images and audio conversations) are usable and compliant for the task at hand.4. Response quality evaluators
Response Quality Evaluators help you evaluate how correctly, consistently, and in line with ground truth your AI follows instructions and answers user queries in any setting — with or without RAG (correctness, instruction adherence, ground truth adherence).5. RAG evaluators
RAG Evaluators help you evaluate retrieval and generation quality in RAG pipelines, including retrieval quality (chunk relevance, context relevance, context precision, Precision @ K) and generation quality (chunk attribution utilization, context adherence, completeness).6. Safety and compliance evaluators
Safety And Compliance Evaluators identify potential risks, harmful content, bias, or privacy concerns in AI interactions.7. Text-to-SQL evaluators
Text-to-SQL evaluators evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of SQL queries generated by AI models from natural language inputs.Next steps
Custom LLM-as-a-judge evaluators
Learn how to create evaluators using LLMs to judge the quality of responses
Custom code-based evaluators
Learn how to create, register, and use custom evaluators to evaluate your LLM applications
Improve LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluators with Autotune
Learn how to improve your LLM-as-a-judge evaluators using expert feedback with Autotune
